A missed deadline, service failure, or drop in performance can all have multiple plausible explanations. This root cause analysis template guides your team through investigating those possibilities and determining which causes the evidence supports. It organizes your findings, decisions, and follow-up actions, ensuring everyone understands the next steps. You’ll also learn how to choose an RCA format, lead a productive analysis, and see how companies use root cause analysis to solve problems.
Transform overwhelm into opportunity when you align your teams, automate tracking, and make data-driven decisions. Do it all with ease and discover your path to operational excellence.
Root cause analysis is a process for identifying the underlying cause of a problem. Rather than addressing only the immediate symptoms, RCA traces the sequence of events to determine where the problem originated.
RCA aims to prevent problems from happening again, and to achieve this, it’s important to distinguish symptoms from causes. Symptoms, such as missed deadlines, defects, rework, customer complaints, and system downtime, are noticeable but may not reflect the underlying issue.
The root cause is the underlying condition that leads to the symptom. Examples include missing processes, inconsistent training, inadequate tools, or earlier decisions with downstream effects. Addressing a problem's root cause is more effective than repeatedly treating symptoms.
During security incidents, Asana’s security team documents investigative questions and status updates, and tracks long-term mitigations in a shared backlog. Keeping investigation and follow-up work together enables the team to act on lessons learned. Use the root cause analysis template similarly: define the problem, test possible causes, assign corrective actions, and review results. Complete each section as you investigate, and revisit earlier steps if new evidence emerges.
Free root cause analysis templateDocument what occurred, when it happened, and which work was impacted. Include a metric and baseline to quantify the change. For example, if website views declined, define what constitutes a view, specify the comparison dates, and note whether the decline affected the entire site or specific pages. Enter these details under “Problem and baseline” and “Scope and period.”
Gather records that show what changed and help explain why. For a decline in website views, review page-level traffic, search queries, indexing reports, recent site changes, and search demand trends. Record the source and time period for each piece of information. A team member’s observations can guide your root cause analysis, but always verify with supporting records before accepting them as evidence.
Onfido sends customer survey feedback to an Asana board, where its Revenue Operations team can review each response and decide how to follow up. According to Asana’s case study, the number of cases where the team could not identify why a customer was dissatisfied fell to zero.
List possible explanations for your findings. For website views, these might include technical issues, stronger competing pages, or content that no longer addresses relevant queries. Add each under “Possible causes” and note how you would test them. Treat each as a possibility until you review the evidence.
Read: How to use problem framing to solve team inefficienciesFor each possible cause, record supporting and contradicting evidence in “Evidence and test.” For example, if affected pages remain indexed but clicks from priority queries have dropped, and the content no longer answers relevant questions, this weakens the indexing explanation and suggests a content gap to investigate further.
In “Decision,” identify the supported cause or causes and note any unresolved issues. In an Asana data infrastructure investigation, the team traced a missed email alert to an oversized error log. Identifying the failure let the team change log handling and add email failure detection.
Jocey Karlan, a former Asana product management lead, described her team as “leading with hypotheses and allowing customers to prove us wrong.” The same habit helps when using a root cause analysis template: name an explanation, then look for evidence that could overturn it.
Select an action that addresses a cause your team has supported with evidence. Under “Corrective action,” note what will change, who is responsible, and the due date. If a temporary measure is needed during the investigation, record it separately under “Immediate containment.”
Set a review date and decide what you’ll measure before making the change. Enter the result under “Review,” along with any other changes that may have affected it. A corrective action plan can help your team assign and track the work.
KENDO’s IT team received requests with insufficient detail, which delayed the project. To address this, the team implemented an Asana form to capture necessary information and convert each request into a task. A project manager scopes the work, and leaders approve it before production. Asana’s case study reports that this change reduced unnecessary stakeholder communication. If your investigation identifies a similar issue in your intake process, document the change you will make and monitor its effectiveness.
A root cause analysis template helps your team document incidents, investigate causes, and determine necessary changes. Use it throughout the investigation to keep evidence, decisions, and follow-up actions organized. You can copy the template into a document or use it to structure an Asana project.
Free root cause analysis templateReplace the prompts in this root cause analysis form with your team’s findings. Add entries during the investigation and allow space for multiple possible causes.
Field | Your analysis |
Problem and baseline | [Describe what happened. Include the usual result and what changed.] |
Scope and period | [Identify the affected work, pages, or process and the dates you’re investigating.] |
Possible causes | [List the explanations your team will investigate.] |
Evidence and test | [For each possible cause, record what supports it, what challenges it, and what you still need to check. Link to the relevant records.] |
Decision | [Name the cause or causes supported by the evidence. Note any questions that remain open.] |
Immediate containment | [If needed, describe what your team will do to limit the problem while investigating. Assign an owner.] |
Corrective action | [Describe the change your team will make. Add an owner and a due date.] |
Review | [Choose a measure and a review date. After the change, record the result and decide whether more work is needed.] |
Create a project for the investigation and add tasks to check possible causes, implement changes, and review results. Assign each task an owner and due date. Attach reports, links, and findings to the relevant tasks so teammates can track progress.
For a website traffic problem, the project could include tasks to check technical issues, compare search queries with page content, and review competitor rankings.
You can also ask Asana AI to draft a project plan from a description such as, “Create a project to investigate a decline in website views and track corrective actions.” Review the suggested tasks and dates, then add your team’s evidence. Once the format meets your needs, save the project as a reusable template.
Suppose a marketing team observes a decline in organic search visits. Before making updates, the team must identify which pages lost views and determine possible causes.
The flowchart outlines several possible explanations and a proposed content update. Use the branches to organize the investigation and verify data before confirming any cause.
Below is an example of how the team could complete the template during the investigation:
Field | Example |
Problem and baseline | Organic page views across the website fell from 10,000 during March 1–30 to 7,500 during April 1–30. |
Scope and period | The team compares two 30-day periods. Two pages account for 1,800 of the 2,500 lost views. |
Possible causes | Technical or indexing issues, competitors gaining search visibility, or content that no longer answers relevant search queries. |
Evidence and test | The affected pages remain indexed. Clicks from important search queries have fallen, and a content review identifies questions the pages don't answer. The team also checks technical reports, competitor changes, and search demand. |
Decision | Missing content is a leading explanation for the two pages’ decline. Other explanations and the remaining loss of views still need investigation. |
Immediate containment | No temporary measure is needed. The team continues monitoring the affected pages while it investigates. |
Corrective action | Maya updates the two pages to answer the missing questions by May 9. |
Review | On June 9, Ari reviews the same pages and search queries. Sitewide organic page views have reached 9,200 over a comparable 30-day period. Ari checks how much of that increase came from the updated pages and whether other changes affected the result. |
Maya can document her content review in an Asana task, attaching search queries, page reports, and missing answers. As she investigates, she notes which findings support the proposed cause and which raise new questions. Her teammates can review this evidence before agreeing on a solution.
Once the update is complete, Ari adds the results to the review task. The team then decides whether to close the investigation, implement further changes, or explore other possible causes.
Use our root cause analysis template to investigate problems, document evidence, and track solutions. The RCA formats below are popular techniques to identify possible causes. Use 5 Whys to trace a sequence of events. For multiple types of causes, use a fishbone diagram. If you can categorize recurring problems, use a Pareto chart to decide where to investigate first. Whichever method you choose, log evidence, decisions, owners, and review dates in the template.
The 5 Whys method helps identify a problem's root cause by repeatedly asking why it occurred and examining the factors behind each answer. Document supporting evidence for each response, and explore multiple paths if several explanations are possible. Continue until you find a cause your team can test and resolve. Asana’s 5 Whys template organizes questions and follow-up tasks in one place.
A fishbone diagram maps possible causes as branches leading to a single problem. Use it when multiple types of causes may be involved. For example, if website views drop, a team can create branches for technical issues, search competition, demand, and content, then review each against traffic and site records. The diagram organizes the investigation, while the records show which causes are most likely.
A Pareto chart ranks categories by frequency or impact, highlighting those that contribute most to a problem. Use it when you can quantify issues by type or measure losses by page. For example, a website team may find that two pages account for most lost views and focus their investigation there. The chart shows where to start, but you need further analysis to identify the underlying causes.
Fault tree analysis: A diagram that traces a system failure back to its possible causes. Use it when multiple conditions may have contributed to the failure.
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA): An assessment of how a product or process might fail and the impact of each failure. Use it to prioritize risks before they cause or repeat problems.
Scatter diagram: A chart that plots two variables to show their relationship. Use it with paired data to explore potential correlations, but note that patterns do not confirm causation.
DMAIC: A five-stage method (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) for improving existing processes. Use it when a recurring problem requires structured improvement and a plan to maintain results.
8D method: A team-based process that documents containment, root cause, corrective actions, and verification. Use it when a recurring problem impacts multiple teams or requires a formal response.
Events and causal factor analysis: A timeline linking incident events to contributing conditions. Use it when a problem developed over time and involved multiple factors.
Change analysis: Compare conditions before and after a problem occurred. Use it when an issue follows a change to a process, tool, or team to determine if the change contributed.
Barrier analysis: Review of safeguards intended to prevent incidents or limit their impact. Use it when a safeguard was missing, bypassed, or failed.
After gathering records, assemble team members familiar with the problems to review their observations. Appoint one person to lead the discussion and track outstanding items.
For a decline in website views, include those responsible for analytics, search, content, and recent site changes. Ask each participant to share their observations and identify records that could clarify disagreements. For example, someone who updated pages may know of changes not reflected in traffic charts, while someone monitoring indexing can verify technical issues.
Begin with evidence-based questions such as: “Which pages lost views?” “Which pages held steady?”, and “What would we expect to see if this explanation were wrong?” Document any unanswered questions and assign follow-up tasks. Open questions are valuable only if the team pursues them to a specific record or observation.
Saying “The writer caused the traffic loss” assigns blame without addressing the underlying pattern. Instead, stating “These pages do not answer the queries that now bring visitors to this topic” identifies a testable condition. Clearly describe the process or content issue, compare it with the evidence, and select an actionable step for the team.
Read: What are the benefits of project management?Root cause analysis takes time, but identifying and addressing underlying causes can help prevent problems from recurring. Once your team agrees on a solution, put it into action. Asana’s workflow management tools help you assign tasks, set deadlines, and track progress in one place, so your team can follow through and review the results.
Ready to streamline your problem-solving process? Get started with Asana today.
Free root cause analysis templateThe most costly RCA mistakes occur when teams implement fixes without verifying the link between the observation and the solution. Before closing an RCA document, check for these common mistakes:
A vague problem statement: Specify the measure, baseline, affected work, and time period rather than simply stating “traffic is down.”
Stopping at the first plausible answer: Identify alternative causes and document evidence that supports or challenges each.
Assigning blame: Focus on describing the process or system conditions that can be reviewed and improved.
Calling an untested explanation a root cause: Distinguish between possible causes and those supported by evidence. For example, in a website-traffic flowchart, “website isn’t ranking” may describe a symptom rather than provide an explanation.
Leaving a vague action: Replace general actions like “revamp content” with specific pages to update, questions to address, an assigned owner, a due date, and a follow-up measure.
The 5 P’s—parts, position, people, paper, and paradigms—form an evidence-gathering checklist in the PROACT RCA approach. They guide investigators to review physical components, locations, personal accounts, written records, and assumptions about work processes. Use these categories where relevant, but they are not required for every RCA. Select records that fit the problem and test any explanations they suggest.
Five is a guideline, not a strict limit. Continue asking “why” until the team identifies a cause that can be tested and addressed. If an answer remains an assumption, gather supporting evidence or explore another line of inquiry. Asana’s 5 Whys template can help document questions and follow-up actions.
Use a fishbone diagram when multiple types of causes may explain a problem, and you need to map them. Use 5 Whys when you can trace a specific sequence of events. Both tools can be combined: map possible causes first, then investigate a promising branch. In all cases, compare proposed causes with records before selecting a solution.
A root cause is a condition that evidence directly links to the problem and that corrective action can address. A contributing factor increases the likelihood or impact of the problem but does not fully explain it. For example, missing answers on two web pages may explain their lost search traffic, while a broader change in demand could contribute to a sitewide decline. An RCA may identify multiple supported causes.
An RCA document should include the problem statement and baseline, affected work and time period, possible causes with supporting and opposing evidence, the supported finding and any remaining uncertainty, immediate containment actions, corrective action with owner and due date, and the review measure, date, and observed result. An RCA template can help organize the investigation and allow your team to document decisions and follow-up tasks.